![]() Therefore, under California labor law, the increased rate should have been used to calculate payment when overtime work occurred. Such non-discretionary bonuses should be regarded as part of a non-exempt employee’s pay and total compensation rate. When the bank paid employees overtime wages, they allegedly did not consider non-discretionary bonuses. In the lawsuit, Rocio also accused Chase of other payment undercutting practices. The bank also told employees to log only the time they were scheduled to work, not the actual hours they worked. The discretion arose due to the bank’s requirement for tellers to tally their drawers before and after their documented shift times.Īdditionally, the bank allegedly required hourly workers to round down on their reported start and stop times. ![]() However, her actual time spent working often totaled closer to eight hours. Rocio’s testimony details that she was regularly scheduled and paid for five-and-a-half- to six-hour work shifts. Accusations Against Chase Bank Time Shaving Practices
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |